0

I was a huge fan of Boston Celtics when there were Big 3 on the team. They have disappeared and now I'm a fan of Cleveland. But I'd like to say that I liked Celtics more than I do Cleveland now. In this situation, these sentences are possible to use? Or is there any difference between them?

  1. I used to be a bigger fan of Boston Celtics than I am of Cleveland now.

  2. I'm not as big a fan of Cleveland as I used to be of Boston Celtics.

  • "I'm more of a Cleveland fan now" or "Now I'm a bigger Cleveland fan than a Celtics fan". "Now" alone is sufficient to indicate the idea you're trying to convey with "used to be", though you could say "I'm a bigger Cleveland fan now than I used to be, now that the Celtics no longer have the Big 3". – Tᴚoɯɐuo Aug 13 '15 at 22:56
1

The first does not convey your being a Cleveland fan, I think. If you consider that Cleveland is your favorite team now, then you ought to specify that. It doesn't really have to be a single sentence, perhaps. Or you can use the semicolon to separate two parts if you feel there needs to be a single full stop. Or something like

I was a huge fan of Celtics in the past, and now I like Cleveland, but not nearly as much.

As to the difference between the two sentences, the second one appears to explain that you actually are a fan of Cleveland, yet some tone of exclusivity of your team preference is lacking...

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.