0

The original sentence is

The apple which is lying on the table is mine

Can I shorten it to be

The apple lying on the table is mine

I saw a expression describing RELATIVE CLAUSE on the random website, and they were like

if the relative pronoun is followed by a verb, the relative pronoun is a subject pronoun, subject pronoun must always be used

But I think it's not the same thing, right?

First one is relative clause in opposition to the abbreviated sentence using participle clause grammar, is it not?

5
  • By the way,I posted this question using my phone. And i cannot find any formatting option or button as opposed to computer version.i mean,english stack exchange APP. – 오준수 Aug 15 '15 at 7:03
  • 2
    Maybe you did this on your phone, but you can still use an upper-case "I" for the first person pronoun. Please don't use "I posted this on my phone" as an excuse for sloppy posts. – J.R. Aug 15 '15 at 9:02
  • 1
    This is called Whiz-Deletion; for example, see english.stackexchange.com/a/50971/11482. – Damkerng T. Aug 15 '15 at 10:18
  • "...on a random website", BTW. – Tᴚoɯɐuo Aug 15 '15 at 13:22
  • If the meaning of either phrase is the same, I would leave it out. In the first example, I would use that instead of which, but that is another topic. – user3169 Aug 15 '15 at 16:35
3
  1. The apple which is lying on the table is mine.

  2. The apple lying on the table is mine.

Both the sentences are grammatically correct; there's no difference in meaning. In the first sentence, "which is lying on the table is mine" is a relative clause.

In the second sentence, "lying on the table" is the reduced relative clause. You can reduce a relative clause by omitting the relative pronoun and the auxiliary verb when the main verb in the relative clause is progressive.

3
  • The first sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be: "The apple, which is lying on the table, is mine." – CluelessJoeJackson Nov 14 '15 at 1:26
  • CluelessJoeJackson, the relative clause " which is lying on the table" is a defining relative clause for which you don't use commas. – Khan Nov 14 '15 at 2:00
  • I think we need more context. Is there more than one apple? – CluelessJoeJackson Nov 14 '15 at 2:14
0

They are both grammatically correct and both are not what a native English speaker would say. A more natural expression is:

The apple on the table's mine.

1
  • I'd use the second one, actually (although maybe without 'lying'). – Deusovi Nov 13 '15 at 15:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.