1

Let's suppose we have a sentence:

If I see John I will tell him you are looking for him.

Now how should I put it in reported speech in the past? Like this:

Mike said that if he saw (?) John he would tell him I was (?) looking for him.

Is it correct?

3 Answers 3

2

Yes, that's exactly how you should phrase it for past reported speech.

1

That's correct. But you can write the following way too.

If he saw John, Mike said, he would tell him I was looking for him.

It depends on "emphatic purposes".

1
  • That doesn't work well for me. It looks like you've put in a comma inappropriately to this sentence: If he saw John, Mike said he would tell him O was looking for him
    – Beta Decay
    Nov 9, 2015 at 7:11
0

Just brainstorming here. Let's assume the fact that there could have been chances for Mike having seen John, this could be a case of future in the past. How about

Mike said that if he sees John, he would tell him I was looking for him.

2
  • When it comes with the present simple, the tense is not normally changed. (For example: facts, regular actions, etc.) So normally you do the backshift like the OP's example.
    – Schwale
    Dec 9, 2015 at 11:29
  • I believe it should be "saw"
    – Varun Nair
    Jan 8, 2016 at 11:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .