I need to Change the Given conditional clauses into its other 2 types, i.e., into its imaginary and impossible clause.

"I will help you, if it's possible"

My approach:


  • I would help you, if it was possible.
  • I would have helped you, if it had been possible.

I am confused when I have written that:

  • 'I would help you, if it "was" or "were" possible.'

because its can be used as an adjective as well as pronoun or should I use 3rd person singular concept here, it may be than?

Please correct me why either of the statement cannot be used and with what it can be used?

  • 2
    As discussed before: this needs breaking down into individual, specific questions.
    – Stephie
    Commented Aug 28, 2015 at 5:54
  • 1
    I agree with Stephie. Also, even after this question is broken down and posted individually, you still should write about your idea. Writing about your idea what the answer is and why can help your learning, and at the same time will help our answerers to assess points needed to be addressed better. Commented Aug 28, 2015 at 6:31
  • @Stephie i have edited my question. Commented Aug 28, 2015 at 6:56
  • @DamkerngT. i have done editing. Commented Aug 28, 2015 at 6:57
  • @JalajChawla - Some more editing hints, for the future: (1) Don't use the sentence you are working on as the title of your question – it doesn't tell us what you are trying to ask. (2) Be tidy, not sloppy. Use proper spacing around punctuation and avoid mistakes like a llower-case "i". These are distracting and make your question harder to understand. Lastly, as to your question ("Should it be "if it was possible," or "if it were possible"), that's a toughy. If I were you, I'd read Hellion's answer here.
    – J.R.
    Commented Aug 28, 2015 at 9:06

1 Answer 1


I'm pretty sure that the forms you are looking for are:

I would help you if it were possible.
I would have helped you if it had been possible.

Those are the forms which match the three 'canonical' conditionals which are usually taught in EFL classes.


  • These are not clauses but constructions which each involve two clauses.
  • The distinction of these constructions as "imaginary" and "impossible" is inaccurate.
  • There are far more variations available than just these two, including a variation employing would help ... was.

It's is always a contraction of it is, never an "adjective" (actually a possessive pronoun). And its is always the possessive pronoun.

  • Yes,Thankx for adding the point Sir.Also i didn't got Why you used were in the first conditions? Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 12:26
  • @JalajChawla Because that's the 'standard' irrealis (or subjunctive or hypothetical or imaginary or whatever-you-call-it) form. Realis (indicative) was in the condition clause with would in the consequence clause would mean something different: it would mark past tense rather than modality. Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 12:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .