It is funny how you say that.
It is amazing what you did.
It is terrible why it happened.

Those sentences have same structure: It is + adjective + wh clause.

My question is, is it always possible to use this sentence structure with ANY adjective? I sometimes find this sentence hard to use with some adjectives like "happy".

Also, please tell me the name of this sentence. It would help me greatly. Thank you.

  • Dear close voter, could you please stop?! This is starting to get really annoying. On another note, this is a very interesting question. What adjectives can't fit in that construction? – M.A.R. Aug 30 '15 at 22:40
  • None of those three sentences sound natural to me - they are all just slightly off, and seem to toe the line between two different meanings in each case. 1 It is funny that you say that or . How you say that is funny. 2 . What you did is amazing. or It is amazing that you did that. 3 . How it happened is terrible. or It is terrible that it happened. – Adam Sep 2 '15 at 21:21
  • All three example adjectives describe the speaker's emotional reaction to <the wh clause>. – Jasper Dec 1 '15 at 18:02

I'm trying to think of adjectives that wouldn't work here. Using the adjective "furry" or another adjective describing a physical trait struggles to work in your case.

The closest I can come to using furry in a sentence like yours is below, but it doesn't look like it works.

It is furry what you made your dog.


They all are correct.

Consider the following sentences -

  1. How you say that is funny.
  2. What you did is amazing.
  3. What happened is terrible.

These sentences make sense and indeed correct.

Consider sentence #2

What you did is amazing.

The bold part - what you did - is either a fused relative construction or an open interrogative.

Consider sentence #3

What happened is terrible.

The bold part - what happened - is either a fused relative construction or an open interrogative.

Consider sentence #1

How you say that is funny.

The bold part - how you say that - is an open interrogative, not a fused relative clause.

A fused relative construction can never occur in extraposition construction. But an open interrogative can.

The following sentences are correct -

It's possible that out team might win.

Here that is a subordinator and it introduces a subordinate clause to complete the meaning.

It's I who did it.

In this sentence who did it is a relative construction and who a relativizer. The relative construction is adding some information about its antecedent - I.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.