1

Which one is correct?

page has not updated

or

page has not been updated.

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Aug 31 '15 at 11:26

This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

  • 1
    Both are equally valid and correct: The page has not updated. The page has not been updated. -- Welcome to the site. – Carl Smith Aug 23 '15 at 7:12
  • Hi janavi, welcome to Stack Exchange. We do answer questions here, but only certain kinds of questions: those that fit the description in our Help Center. You'll see that we ask that all proofreading questions include the specific issue you want to learn about. – sumelic Aug 23 '15 at 7:20
  • possible duplicate of Is "update" transitive or intransitive? – Edwin Ashworth Aug 23 '15 at 8:29
  • Any chance this might get moved to ell instead of being dismissed? – DRF Aug 23 '15 at 13:25
  • For me, these two phrases have different meanings. The second phrase means that a human being has not posted an update to the page yet. On the other hand, I could use the first phrase in the following situation, as an example: Say I post something to the web, refresh the page, and do not see my update yet. Why? Because there is a delay behind the scenes, at the software level. A good example of that is the posting of Comments on StackExchange. I write a comment, I hit "Add Comment," and then there is a short delay before the comment is visible on the web (even if I refresh the page). – aparente001 Aug 24 '15 at 19:45
2

There are slight nuances to the different words. Both implicitly place "blame" and the nuance indicates where.

The page has not updated.

This places the "blame" on the page or the system itself. It's pretty neutral. "Oh! the page hasn't updated. We've done what we ought, but the page hasn't kept up."

The page has not been updated.

This places the "blame" on the content administrator. It is a little more apologetic. "Oh! we didn't update this page. It might be that we don't have anything new to say or we just weren't able to get around to it."

Which makes more sense? In the future, this would be a better fit for the UX SE site

1

I think both should have a "the" in front of them. However both should be correct. I hope I helped. :)

  • 1
    Thanks for your contribution, Abs, and welcome to Stack Exchange! It's great that you want to help. To get a better understanding of the philosophy and goals of the site, I'd recommend taking the 2-minute tour: english.stackexchange.com/tour – sumelic Aug 23 '15 at 7:22
  • Deletions (eg of articles) are common and acceptable in some registers (conversational; headlinese; terse instructional) (but only where clarity is not compromised). – Edwin Ashworth Aug 23 '15 at 8:31
  • Looks like a terse onscreen help msg. – Brian Hitchcock Aug 23 '15 at 8:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy