When a person got a cold, but he didn't want to have any medicine as he believed that it could be got well after having a rest. In this situation, does this sentence below sound natural? Or how would you express this?

He wanted to cure it by himself after he got a cold.


Firstly, it sounds unnatural to refer to "it" before introducing the word "cold" in your sentence. Secondly, the word "by" is unnecessary. I would phrase the sentence as such:

He got a cold and wanted to cure it himself.

You might also use the word "insist" to emphasize how your subject didn't want to take other people's advice.

He got a cold and insisted on curing it himself.

To make it clear that the subject wanted to get better without the use of medicine, you might also say:

He got a cold and insisted on letting it heal naturally.

Another suggestion from snailboat's comment, which makes it absolutely clear that there was no treatment is involved:

He got a cold and insisted on letting it run its course.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I'm not really sure whether heal is the right word here, because it usually refers to the injury such as a cut wound. – canoe May 24 '13 at 14:08
  • @canoe: Possibly, but I'm struggling to find a better word for it. I sometimes hear people say a cold "goes away", so... "Let it go away naturally?" – Stephan May 24 '13 at 14:15
  • 3
    I've always used the phrase let it run its course. – snailplane May 24 '13 at 23:42

To be more natural though, building on Stephan's answer, you might turn it to something like...

He got a cold, but insisted on recovering naturally.

"curing it (by) himself" can also mean to take medicine of his choice.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Yes, so @Stephan's answer might not consider this condition. But get over really means another thing, which is getting better after sickness. See here. – canoe May 24 '13 at 13:55
  • @canoe We use 'get over' to mean that usually where I am, I guess it lost a bit of its meaning! I changed it to 'recover', which is more to the point. – Jerry May 24 '13 at 13:59
  • 1
    @Jerry: Good point! I have expanded my own answer to better address this. – Stephan May 24 '13 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.