0

My rabbit was probably bitten by a snake. A good theory; however, just because I saw/had seen one today didn't mean he was bitten by one in his last hours.

As far as I could remember, my dog had never chased any birds. He was/had been only interested in cats.

This is past-tense narrative talking about past events. I'm a little confused about what tense to use in the bolded parts.

Maybe I'm mixing up things? Should I use the simple past or part perfect in the sentences above?

  • Is there any connection between those sentences? – Maulik V Oct 5 '15 at 12:04
  • @MaulikV Yes, they are talking about the same thing. – alexchenco Oct 5 '15 at 12:05
  • Ought to be "bitten by a snake". In the first fragment it is unclear who is "he" and why you used "did". Did what? Did be bitten? – Victor Bazarov Oct 5 '15 at 12:14
  • @VictorBazarov I edited the sentence to make it more clear. – alexchenco Oct 5 '15 at 12:16
1

In both passages the choice gives a slight difference in meaning.

Let's imagine the time at which you discover the rabbit dead. You have seen a snake (it was some time before, doesn't matter when, just matters there was at some point a snake around). You make a conjecture that it may or may not have been the cause of the rabbit's demise. Moving to the past tense shifts everything, including "have seen" -> "had seen".

Now, if you wan to say that the moment you lay your eyes on the snake was "today", in other words at a particular time, it also works. It's the proximity in time between seeing the snake and the rabbit's death what you're conveying. So, past tense "I saw one today" also works.

In the second passage (about the dog), if brought to the present time, you can say "he is only interested in cats", which simply characterizes the dog's behavior in general. Or, you can say "he has been only interested in cats" (expressing thus the behavior patterns you observed frequently in the past). That's the difference.

Both are grammatically OK.

  • Thanks. So, if the dog was already dead (past-tense narration), I can only use "had been"? Since "was" would imply that the dog is still alive at the time of the narration? – alexchenco Oct 5 '15 at 12:34
  • 1
    Yes, I'd say so. It wasn't clear from the passage that the dog was dead. – Victor Bazarov Oct 5 '15 at 12:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.