Which of the following sentences is correct?
This car should be used sparingly by whom is concerned with efficiency.
This car should be used sparingly by who is concerned with efficiency.
and why?
Which of the following sentences is correct?
This car should be used sparingly by whom is concerned with efficiency.
This car should be used sparingly by who is concerned with efficiency.
and why?
- This car should be used sparingly by xxx [who is concerned with efficiency].
- This car should be used sparingly by [wh--- is concerned with efficiency].
The Original Poster is attempting a grammatically sophisticated sentence. They are trying to use who a bit like the pronoun what. Consider the following sentences:
The first sentence has a relative clause which makes you happy. This clause is modifying the noun phrase the activities. Inside the relative clause, the word which refers to the activities. We say that the noun phrase the activities is the ANTECEDENT for the relative clause.
In the second sentence you will see that there is no antecedent. The word what means the thing(s) which. Notice that this whole relative construction is the object of the verb do. There is no noun phrase which the word is modifying. We call this kind of clause a fused relative.
Now, the word what can appear freely in fused relatives, but the wh- words who, which, when and where, cannot usually appear in fused relatives if they are the Subject of that clause. Even when they aren't Subjects, they only appear as the heads of fused relatives with a very few verbs such as choose, want and like.
The sentences above are not good because we are using these wh- words without an antecedent for the clause. In other words, we are using them in fused relative constructions.
If we want to use these relative words in fused relative constructions, we need to add the suffix -ever. This will give us a new relative word that we can use freely in fused relative constructions:
In the Original Poster's sentence there is no antecedent for who is concerned with efficiency. There are two ways to resolve this problem. Firstly we could put an antecedent into the sentence as in (1) at the top of this post. Here are a few suggestions:
Alternatively, we could use a pronoun with -ever:
The problem with this sentence is that we like to use whoever when we are picking out a specific known group or are selecting people from a narrow set. Because we are identifying an almost unlimited group of people from an unbounded set the sentence doesn't work very well. If you were speaking to a small group of drivers, say ten people, the sentence above would be fine. It's not great however, for the Original Poster's requirements. For this reason I would choose the first or third examples above:
However, this relative clause begins with who is. We can make the sentence snappier if we delete the who is:
Here the relative clauses have turned into participle clauses modifying the words anyone and those.
The mnemonic I use for that is that when him will work, whom will too.
So swap in "him":
... him is concerned with efficiency.
Since "him" doesn't work here, neither does "whom".
... he is concerned with efficiency.
We have a winnah!
Neither...
I would reword:
This car should be used sparingly by anyone concerned with efficiency.