4

Is it fine to use the following sentence:

We propose an algorithm that has a reduced complexity but achieves only a fraction of the...

More specifically, do I need to add something (for instance: "that" or "which") after "but"?

  • 2
    Yes, no. And welcome! – Stephie Oct 27 '15 at 13:17
  • 1
    Usually advised in personal business communication, so take it with a grain of salt: try replacing "but" with "and", it might sound better. – Victor Bazarov Oct 27 '15 at 13:28
  • @VictorBazarov But "but" here is used to express the fact that "has a reduced complexity" is a positive aspect whereas "achieves only a fraction of the.." is a negative one. So you still think that "and" could replace "but" ? – tam Oct 27 '15 at 13:59
  • 1
    @mat, it was unclear from your question what is positive, what's negative. Try using "yet" instead, or put the negative first so you end on a positive statement. – Victor Bazarov Oct 27 '15 at 14:00
  • @VictorBazarov you mean: "We propose an algorithm that achieves only a fraction of the region yet has a reduced complexity". Thank you! – tam Oct 27 '15 at 15:04
1

Your sentence is correct as is.

It would be incorrect to add "that" or "which" after "but."

Source: Native speaker

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.