I am having a debate with a friend. She thinks this is correct:
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then of stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support his claim of > innocence.
and I think this is correct:
The judge told the jury that he had excused a juror for having purposely provided murder photos to the media and then stashing the money he had received to hide evidence that would support his claim of > innocence.
the debate is about whether the of is necessary. What do we think?