0

What is the correct option of these two following options? I'm talking about the beak of the Bulbul birds.

  1. Bulbul bird beak

  2. Bulbul bird's beak

closed as off-topic by ColleenV, Nihilist_Frost, M.A.R., Glorfindel, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩 Nov 1 '15 at 22:32

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – ColleenV, M.A.R., Glorfindel, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 4
    Neither of those is a sentence. Please provide the full sentence you are considering. – Jim Nov 1 '15 at 0:36
4

Whether you use a possessive with apostrophe-s ("Bulbul bird's beak") or a noun adjunct ("Bulbul bird beak") depends on how you wish the phrase to be used. If you are describing a beak that belongs to the bird or is of the bird, then use the first one. If you are generally modifying the noun's meaning, especially if referring to Bulbul birds' beaks in general, then it is better to use the second. Often you will find that either option is acceptable. If I am talking about a particular Bulbul bird, then it is better to use the possessive, for example "I like to stroke my Bulbul bird's beak." If I am talking about the concept of the beak, especially as it relates to any Bulbul bird, either option is fine, for example: "Few beaks are as fascinating as the Bulbul bird beak." or "Few beaks are as fascinating as the Bulbul bird's beak."

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.