In a written paper, my teacher pointed out a mistake I made, which was using

... problems which flourish ..

Apparently problems can't flourish , I forgot to ask why but I'm assuming because flourish has a positive connotation.

So my question is: What is the pejorative counterpart to the word flourish (which would be appropriate for my example of course)?

  • Also; is counterpart to correct or should it be counterpart of? – Practice4CPE Jun 12 '13 at 16:00
  • It doesn't fit the specific usage here, but in other contexts, brandish can be a more negative version of flourish. – FumbleFingers Jun 12 '13 at 22:32

Personally, I don't think using 'problems that flourish' is actually bad here. I would actually use it in non-work writing. But she is correct that it is a positive word.

Maybe you can use 'proliferate': which means to increase quickly and is more negative.

If you can include more of the sentence I can tell you if that would fit well..

  • Keep in mind I'm still a rookie so it's not quite Shakespearean, but it was: 'The aim of this report is to describe the various problems which flourish in the city of ...' – Practice4CPE Jun 12 '13 at 16:10
  • Gotta say, I think your teacher is wrong on this one... I would have written this sentence. I would suggest "The aim of this report is to describe the various problems plaguing the city of..." – Meeka Jun 12 '13 at 16:12
  • 2
    It would certainly not be the first time. I however agree that plaguing is more fitting/elegant. – Practice4CPE Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
  • I feel the appropriateness of using flourish in this instance depends on the tone and intent of the writing overall, is it satirical or factual? In either case I feel the correctness would be based on the overall purpose and intended audience of the writing- seeing only this sentence takes it out of context. – Ross McConeghy Jun 12 '13 at 17:11
  • @Practice4CPE: You could consider words like bedevil, plague, etc., but you might think they're a bit "flowery" for a [technical?] report. Only you know if you want to emphasise the fact that they [continue to] adversely the inhabitants, or that pre-existing problems are becoming more acute, or that there are more [different] problems arising, etc. – FumbleFingers Jun 12 '13 at 23:31

The word flourish means to grow, spread, or develop in a prosperous way. So you wouldn't say a problem is flourishing, unless you are saying that the problem spreading is a good thing (or maybe telling the story from the problem's point of view as the protagonist — grin).

You need a word that suggests something is spreading, but in a negative (or at least neutral) way.

A few suggestions: infecting, permeating, contaminating, infiltrating.

But you can also change the context a bit by describing the causal effect on the city — hurting, plaguing, distressing, troubling, poisoning — in a way that take it away from trying to make the act of spreading pejorative.


A problem that continues to get worse over time until it is dealt with could be described as festering (sense 2: to putrefy or rot).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.