3
  1. Today an excruciating accident has taken place in our vicinity.
  2. Today an excruciating accident took place in our vicinity.

Today indicates the present time. So I prefer has taken, which has been used in first sentence. But a native speaker of English said that he would prefer took place, though he didn't tell me why he would do this.

Now I ask to the members of this site what do they think about this?

2
  • 3
    Either is acceptable: today can signify a timespan which includes some past times. Commented Nov 29, 2015 at 17:59
  • 1
    Indeed, 5 minutes ago is still the past
    – Jon Story
    Commented Nov 29, 2015 at 18:42

1 Answer 1

4

Today is not necessarily the present. Today signifies the present in the first sentence, since the sentence would be invalid/ungrammatical with an adverb of time that is completely in the past (example: yesterday).

However, since today lasts 24 hours, the use of 'today' in the second sentence (using the simple past) refers to earlier today or earlier in the day, which is in the past. Thus the same word today is conceived of in two different ways.

The use of the present perfect is often used to report the latest news. Its effect is to make the news seem more urgent to listeners or readers.

The use of the simple past reports the event as something that is over and done with, that is, an event that took place in the past.

Again, either verb tense is fine, because today is being used differently.

Another example is

I had a really good day today.

Although "today" is not over, the speaker is referring to the part of the 24-hour period of today that is in the past.

Compare with

I have had a really good day today.

Using the present perfect in this sentence, the adverb of time today must include the moment of speaking (that is, the present).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .