3
  1. Would it be okay if I called you when I got back home?
  2. Would it be okay if I called you when I get back home?

Are both the above sentences grammatically correct? I'm still kinda confused with the tenses agreement thing. And how backshifting works. What i don't get is,do i have to convert the entire sentence to the past,or do i have convert certain parts of the sentence to the past. Or whether i should keep a sentence where i have past tense strictly to the past.

Like:

  1. I was walking down the street the other day, and it hit me how the world worked.
  2. I was walking down the street the other day, and it hit me how the world works.

Do I keep the sentence to the past? Or do I mix tenses?

Improve this question
2
  • In your first two examples, I think you might hear either one in informal conversation. For your second two examples, I think it depends on whether the world still works that way or not. This is just based on how it sounds to me as a native speaker so take it with a grain of salt.
    – Era
    Dec 9, 2015 at 19:00
  • I agree with @Era that either one is likely in informal speech. "It hit me how the world worked" - that is, how the world worked at the time at the time I was walking down the street. "It hit me how the world works" - that is, how the world works, in general, and presumably still does.
    – stangdon
    Dec 9, 2015 at 19:56

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5

It's worth remembering that morphologically, English only has two tenses (present, and "not-present").

By morphological I mean that verbs themselves are only modified for tense by adding -ed to make "non-present" (there's ing to make "continuous", but that's an aspect, not a tense). For all other "tense" differences, we need auxiliary verbs (be, have and things like will, would, should, could).

Probably because of that, we're quite happy to use got in the first example (it's a hypothetical/future situation, where got actually implies "not-present" rather than "past"). In the second example, past tense worked simply echoes the past tense struck me.

Note that present tense is also fine in both cases.

Improve this answer
1
  • Every once in a while, you come across something like, "It's worth remembering that morphologically, English only has two tenses (present, and "not-present").", and it really makes you think. Good stuff FumbleFingers.
    – user70913
    Mar 9, 2018 at 17:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .