- The treasure inside Helen needed to be opened.
- Somebody needed to open the treasure inside Helen.
- The treasure inside Helen needed somebody to open.
Do they mean the same?
English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
NB: change of wording, but not syntax, to make more readable without loss of initial intent of OP.
1) The door inside the building needed to be opened.
2) Somebody needed to open the door inside the building.
3) The door inside the building, needed somebody to open it.
All three are understandable. #3 needs an it as the object to be grammatically correct.
#1 means that the door was closed and there was a reason for it to be open
The door inside the building needed to be opened, so we could have ventilation.
#2 means that the state of the door being open was needed by somebody
Somebody needed to open the door inside the building because it was too stuffy for them.
#3 It means that somebody was necessary to open the door, it could not open by itself.
The door inside the building needed somebody to open it, because it was jammed closed.
The original phrase:
The treasure inside Helen needed to be opened.
and its variations, are unfortunate and have several problems:
Taken literally, the phrase could mean that there is a treasure physically inside Helen which needs to be opened: 1) rarely, if ever, does this occur in real life (aside from possibly microdots embedded in spies, and smugglers swallowing gems/drugs); and if true, 2) would probably result in great harm to Helen being opened.
It could also mean that there is a metaphorical treasure, i.e. love or knowledge, but these are usually not opened. They are usually released or recalled (respectively), but one's heart is opened is a phrased used in literature.
Treasure, itself, is usually not opened. Treasure is discovered, uncovered, found, etc., a treasure chest is opened. So, in this case, the awkward phrasing leaves the reader with the feeling that treasure is a euphemism for something else.
There are other problems with the original which are beyond the ell scope, so we don't need to go into them...