1

Excerpted from chronicle.com:

Henri Bergson argued that the relentless flow of time captures the essence of reality, and that, therefore, all concepts being static, distort reality. Proust channeled this conclusion into the literary techniques of In Search of Lost Time. But while we evaluate Bergson on the merits of his arguments, argumentative validity has no bearing on the accomplishment of Proust.

Why is Bergson's conclusion "literary techniques"?

I found "literary technique" be defined as "an identifiable rule or structure employed in writing which can be identified and used for literary analysis." but Bergson's conclusion to me is a philosophical, even scientific statement, not anything related to analysis in writing.

2

The author does not say that Bergson's conclusion is Proust's technique. She says that Proust "channeled this conclusion into" his technique: that is, that Proust's familiarity with Bergson's philosophical posture is evident in the characteristic form of Proust's work.

Likewise, the definition you provide does not say that "literary technique" is literary analysis. It says that the technique is something actually present in a literary work which can be identified by literary analysis.

Proust is beyond my expertise, so I can't provide concrete examples of Bergson's philosophy "channeled into" Proust's work. But it happens that I wrote a paper in grad school which employed Bergson's ideas on the other end, in literary analysis. Briefly, I argued that unusual elements of Shakespeare's technique in Macbeth—specifically, the constant slipping between flexible iambic pentameter and mechanical trochaic tetrameter, and the construction of the work in long sequences of deliberately overlapping rather than sequential scenes—could be understood to reflect a 'Bergsonian' contrast between the sense of time as durée, something to be lived through and intuited, and the 'mechanical' sense time as something which can be mathematically partitioned and measured. ... Of course there's no question of Shakespeare's having been influenced by Bergson! —but it illustrates how a philosophical posture can be embodied in a work of art, and detected there, without in any way identifying either the creative or the critical activity with the philosophic activity.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.