This question already has an answer here:

I have come across this passage on BBC news website.

"Video and pictures taken by resident Malcolm Carter and sent to the BBC showed the fire that burned on the terrace area earlier on Friday morning had been put out and significantly less smoke was coming from the building."

I do not understand why no articles or an S at the end were used for the word "video". Isn't video a countable noun? Shouldn't it be:

"A video and pictures taken by ..."


"Videos and pictures taken by ..."

Is there a grammar rule that I do not understand?

marked as duplicate by mattdm, Glorfindel, Chenmunka, shin, StoneyB Jan 1 '16 at 18:55

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Although the earlier question doesn't directly address the situation here, the answers do. – mattdm Jan 1 '16 at 17:12

"Video" can be used as an uncountable noun for "the recording and broadcasting of moving images and sound" (Macmillan).



Video is a word that can be treated as a countable noun: "I have only watched half of the videos in my collection."

It can also be treated as an uncountable substance-like noun: "The camera crew got several hours of video on the warehouse fire." That's the sense that was being used in the quote you shared.

It's not unusual for uncountable nouns to be used both ways. For example, one can say, "The recipe calls for a half pound of cheese", or, "I tasted five different cheeses at the party."

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.