3

Here is a chunk from a video on EngVid (the whole piece starts at 0:21; the phrase in question is at 1:06):

You might have heard of this expression by Julius Caesar...

Similarly, modern times, Obama, in his inauguration speech said...

There's another example by Ben Franklin. Some people also say this is a Chinese proverb...

Now, what all three famous men here were doing was using what you're going to learn how to use by the end of this lesson, which is the "Magic of Three".

The three men have already been mentioned, but why is she not using the definite article when referring to them? She is even stressing this part, the word all.

Improve this question
3
  • The ELU SE has a special tag for "all the" questions, pardon the pun. Many of the answers I've come across so far are unclear, however. Here's all the three vs. all three
    – CowperKettle
    Commented Jan 10, 2016 at 21:18
  • 2
    Found a helpful answer by StoneyB
    – CowperKettle
    Commented Jan 10, 2016 at 21:26
  • Because despite what you have read and/or been taught, there is no rule that says the definite article must be used for something that has been mentioned before.
    – Alan Carmack
    Commented Sep 19, 2016 at 13:14

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3

"What all three famous men here were doing" is idiomatic and correct. I have not looked at the numbers in an NGram, but as a native American English speaker I would find "all the three famous men" to sound very odd. I realize this answer is opinion-based, but I hope it will prove useful nevertheless.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .