4

When I refer to old temples or shrines in Japan, shoule I use structures or buildings? I refer to each of them as a shrine or a temple, but when I want to generalize, like all these temples, shrines, walls or whatever in certain place, which were built hundreds years ago, how should I call them? To me, "buildings" sound like things built in this modern era. So I thought structures would be better, but sometimes I've heard people use "buildings" for that. I researched these words myself, but I'm not sure. Could you please explain the difference between two and which is the better word choice here?

  • Why not stick with "temples and shrines"? Specific is often better. – Lambie Sep 25 at 14:41
2

A building generally is designed with walls and a roof. There certainly can be ancient buildings. Structures can be anything that is composed of structural components- a cell structure, a shade structure, etc. My advice is use building only when the referent was at least designed with walls and a roof- even if they have long since fallen in or washed away, and then only if your intent in the usage is to treat it as a whole entity whose basic nature is to have walls and a roof. Use structure when you wish to refer to something that does not walls and a roof or when referring to a building's structural components or design rather than its essence as a closed containing structure.

This building was erected in 100 BC. - We're talking about the whole thing as a building.

This structure has stood for thousands of years - Might be a building or just a bunch of pillars, but we are talking about it's fortitude as a structure.

This building was designed to hold the King's library. The structure's entrance is made of beams 6 feet wide. - We can switch back and forth on what we call it based on what we're saying about it

  • Then, I can call a old bridge a structure because it has no roof. Am I right? – tennis girl Jul 14 '13 at 3:13
  • I think I get the clear idea of differences of these two. – tennis girl Jul 14 '13 at 15:38
  • 1
    @tennis girl: Some bridges do have roofs; either kind could be called a structure. In general, bridge would be a better word, although you might need a more generic word every now and then, as when a journalist writes, There were eleven structures damaged in the fire, which could refer to, say, six houses, one store, an office building, two bridges, and a warehouse. Structures is more generic than buildings. If the two bridges weren't damaged, one might say, There were nine buildings damaged in the fire. – J.R. Jul 16 '13 at 21:08
  • @J.R.Thank you so much for your additional comments. It helped me understand the difference much more clearly. I really appreciate it. – tennis girl Jul 17 '13 at 1:13
3

Interesting question. I would say that building is a common generic hypernym for such structures, and you could describe the places you mention as buildings.

However, you've correctly identified a problem with that word: it's too generic. The word building can be applied to office buildings, strip malls, houses, schools, temples, hotels, factories, stables, arenas, and restaurants. So, it's not very descriptive at all, and I don't think the word structure helps in that regard.

With that in mind, then, I would call the temples and shrines you mention places of worship. At least that word – which has its own entry in many dictionaries – narrows down the particular kind of building.

If you want to emphasize that these places of worship have been standing for hundreds of years, I would use the adjective ancient. So, here's how I would say it:

Last week, we visited many ancient places of worship.

Incidentally, I checked a few places in the thesaurus, and I could find no English word that, by itself, meant "old building." There's the word ruins, but that describes the physical state of a structure more than its age. Some words carry overtones of a probable long existance – such as castle – but castles still can be built today. I can't think of any way to emphasize that the structures have been standing for hundreds of years without using an adjective.

  • I just checked the link you put here. Thank you for all the research. – tennis girl Jul 13 '13 at 12:50
  • Not 100% matching with "old building", but "ancient monument" would be the most likely technical term in the UK - it covers everything from standing-stones to fully-habitable castles. – Mike Brockington Sep 25 at 13:50
0

Generally speaking, a temple would be a fully-grown, human-accessible building, whereas a shrine may be as simple as a single statue, so could while it probably is a 'construction' it could NOT be called a building.

There are various terms you could use, depending on circumstances, such as "Religious site", "Holy site" etc but nothing comes to mind that is a single word.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.