1
  1. If I had left this job, I would have wanted you to come with me.
  2. If I were to have left this job, I would have wanted you to come with me.

I think, though both of them indicate the possibility of past, meanings of both are not same. I would like to know the differences between them.

Thanks!

  • You say you think the meanings are different. Can you explain what two different meanings are involved? FWIW I think they mean exactly the same thing, but more importantly I can't actually think of more than one meaning which could feasibly apply. – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Feb 25 '16 at 17:14
  • ...okay, there's the possibility of an optional "nuance" - but applies to both versions equally. By stressing the auxiliary verb had or were one can give greater emphasis to the fact that I definitely didn't leave the job. (I assume it's just an oversight that you switched from this job to that job.) – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Feb 25 '16 at 17:19
  • 2
    Possible duplicate of If you were to have asked – Damkerng T. Feb 26 '16 at 0:25
  • I think both are about an impossible past. "If I had left..." implies "but I didn't". "If I were to..." is in the subjunctive mood, which suggests an unreal situation. – laugh Feb 26 '16 at 11:41
  • 1
    I believe the phrase "were to have" is temporally different from "had". To me it implies a possible future where the subject of the sentence is in the past. This is closer to the meaning of "If I were to (x)" and less like "if I had (x)". – JamesFaix Mar 4 '16 at 1:22
1

In some sense the second option is the explicit counter-factual form, where just "If I were to [perfect infinitive]" alone is enough to convey that the condition never occurred. The first option means the same thing because of the subjunctive "would [perfect infinitive]" in the conclusion of the sentence. There is also the implicit assumption that a person would know whether or not he had left a job, and hence would only say "If I had left this job" if he was stating a counter-factual. However, consider the following scenario where there is a difference:

If I had offended you the last time, please forgive me.

In this case the speaker/writer implies that he/she does not know whether he/she had offended the other party or not. And indeed for that same reason the counter-factual subjunctive in the condition would be incorrect:

(WRONG) If I were to have offended you the last time, ...

However, the present subjunctive can be used for a possibility of a choice that might be taken:

If you help me, I would be ever so grateful.

If you were to help me, I would be ever so grateful.

But the present subjunctive should not be used in a conditional sentence to denote something that cannot be chosen:

If I make an accidental mistake, please let me know.

(WRONG) If I were to make an accidental mistake, please let me know.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.