Consider the simple question

Are you trying to tell me, …?

and its short answer

I am.

What is the correct way to emphasise this answer with an adverb, like

I am precisely. or I precisely am.

Both possibilities sound equally weird to me. The first sentence seems incomplete to me, instead

I am precisely trying to.

would sound more correct but loses its terseness. The second sentence feels a bit odd but follows the same pattern as “I certainly will.” which is definitely a correct answer to a question “Are you going to …”.

I hope someone can shed some light here!

  • You may be confusing the meaning of the word 'precisely' with something else. To say to someone you are telling them something 'precisely' could be interpreted as insulting. It doesn't carry the emphasis that I think you are looking for.
    – Chenmunka
    Commented Mar 11, 2016 at 15:35
  • Would it be appropriate when talking to a child? What would be otherwise a non-offensive way to carry that emphasis? Commented Mar 11, 2016 at 15:47
  • 1
    I would suggest "That's exactly what I'm saying" or similar.
    – Chenmunka
    Commented Mar 11, 2016 at 17:09

1 Answer 1


It depends on the word(s) chosen and on the question posed.

Are you laughing at me, punk?

I am indeed.

Indeed I am.

no I indeed am.

To be sure, I am.

I am, to be sure.

noI, to be sure, am.

I certainly am.

a little odd Certainly I am.

somewhat outdated I am, certainly.

Do you feel lucky, punk?

I do indeed.

Indeed I do.

no I indeed do.

I certainly do.

Certainly I do.

no I do certainly.

But things change if we complete the phrase:

I do certainly feel lucky.

  • Thank you for your detailed and helpful list. Just to be sure I understand you correctly, is there some grammatical explanation behind this or is this just a question of usage? Commented Mar 13, 2016 at 11:19
  • 1
    Grammatical rules are derived from usage. When enough people say something, it's grammatical, and when most or nearly all speakers tend to avoid it, it's considered ungrammatical, or perhaps marginally grammatical if enough people think it sounds only a little "odd". The spoken language is a seething soup. The only clear rule that seems to work is that the adverb or adverb phrase (when a reply is a barebones "I do|will|am|have|etc") is that the subject + tensed verb not be interrupted.
    – TimR
    Commented Mar 13, 2016 at 11:30
  • I understand that grammatical rules are derived from usage, my question was to understand “is there a structure in what we can observe or does it just look random?”. Thanks for your precisions! Commented Mar 13, 2016 at 12:22
  • ... not be interrupted by a prepositional phrase (or by what once was one), or an infinitive phrase, or complemented by a lone adverb.
    – TimR
    Commented Mar 13, 2016 at 12:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .