Should I use important or importantly in the introductory clause of the second sentence:

Appellant's argument is premature. More important, it lacks merit.

Google NGram shows a significant preference for "more important." Recently, however, it appears the democracy of usage has swung slightly in favor of "more importantly."

I prefer the former, but I am more concerned about learning which one is grammatically proper, and the particular rules that control the analysis. Can someone walk me through it?

  • Paul, could "more importantly" be replaced with "even more" in order to have a more elegant sentence? – user114 Aug 1 '13 at 14:48
  • 3
    @Carlo_R. No, "more importantly" is just fine here. It's a literary device to emphasize the second point; "The argument is premature. But even if it weren't, it also lacks merit." That is, the fact that it is premature is also a bad thing, but its lack of merit is so significant that you wouldn't even need to mention it being premature. It adds emphasis to the negative description of the argument. – WendiKidd Aug 1 '13 at 14:57
  • @WendiKidd: What you say there is all perfectly true - except maybe the very first word. Carlo's alternative seems perfectly acceptable to me, so it's not a matter of "more importantly" somehow being better than "even more". They're both just stylistic choices, it seems to me. There is a "formal grammar" issue regarding adverb/adjective, but Carlo's comment doesn't actually touch on that. – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica Aug 2 '13 at 3:14
  • @FumbleFingers Definitely agree that both are stylistic choices. My "no" was more of a statement that I didn't think "even more" was more elegant; either would do. – WendiKidd Aug 2 '13 at 3:50

Appellant's argument is premature. More importantly, it lacks merit.

"Important" is an adjective, used to qualify a noun.
"Importantly" is an adverb, typically used to qualify a verb or an adjective.

Your context requires an adverb, not an adjective.

Additionally, I would use "it" rather than repeating "the argument".

  • Trevor, so, beginnig a sentence with "more interesting" is wrong and we should say "more interstingly"? I ask because, as FF says, there is an elided "What is more" involved in such constructs. – user114 Aug 1 '13 at 18:33
  • @Carlo_R. "Person A: "I'm going on a day trip to visit the lake. Person B: "More interesting than that would be taking a boat trip across the lake and seeing the view from the other side." No need for any "elided 'What is more' in that type of construct. – TrevorD Aug 1 '13 at 22:38

This is one of those cases where ngrams don't tell the whole story. Words and phrases can be used in multiple ways, so just seeing how often they appear in ngrams doesn't help. The correct form in your example is more importantly, but the ngram will register hits for "more important" in sentences like this:

I considered reading a book after lunch, but I decided running some errands was more important.

Just because more important is correct somewhere else and registers ngram hits doesn't mean it's correct in the way you want to use it.

So, yes, more importantly is what you want to use in your example sentence:

More importantly, it lacks merit.

I'd also take note of your first sentence; this sounds a bit like legal jargon, and so in that case maybe it is appropriate to refer to the appellant as a proper noun (without article). But if this isn't acceptable legalese, you're missing a the at the beginning of the sentence:

The appellant's argument is premature. More importantly, it lacks merit.


NGrams does not show a significant preference for "More important," if we search for a text string more specific to OP's context...

enter image description here

Having said that, what the NGram does suggest is that the "ungrammatical" form has been rising in popularity over recent decades. But if OP is concerned to learn and use "strictly valid" grammar, he should use the adverbial form more importantly.

That's because the presence or absence of the word more makes no difference to the formal grammar. You do something (lack merit, in this case) adverbially. Nothing changes if you do it more adverbially.

If you consider the situation without the word more...

Appellant's argument is premature.
**Important, it lacks merit.*

...all native speakers will find this unacceptable (as indicated by the asterisk). But even though in principle the word more makes no difference to the grammaticality, informal (and/or uneducated) speakers/writers do in fact often use OP's version.

One could say there's an implied/elided "What is more" before important (in practice people often would include either that or an equivalent construction). But OP specifically asks what form he should use; it's not strictly necessary to explain why even native speakers often disregard logic/grammar in this context.


Although it may be ungrammatical, this use of "More important" seems to be quite common (the cited authors reside in the US):

"More important, it appears that theory-based approaches that are tailored to specific populations and behaviours can be effective in different cultures and communities." (source)

"More important, it provides information necessary to explore the relationship of experiencing violence to health status and to the use of health services..." (source)

"Most important, it turns out that how schools hire and how they use their resources can make a major difference." (source)

"Perhaps more important, it may take the form of information useful in trading in the company's shares..." (source)


The adverbial phrase "more importantly" is correct because the lacking of merit is being modified, not the pronoun it (or its antecedent, the appellant's argument).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.