0

What is the difference in the meaning of following sentences (I'm asking for detailed anlaysis of these sentences)

  1. If it rains, I will stay at home.

  2. If it should rain, I will stay at home.

  3. If it should happen to rain, I will stay at home

  4. If it happens to rain, I will stay at home.

    Can I say 'there is no difference in the meaning among 2 ,3 and 4 sentences ? There is no difference in the meaning and usage among 'should', 'happen to' or should happen to' together. Do they all mean 'by chance' ?

Again , i would like to know if the following sentences are grammatically correct or not:

1.If she should happen to read the newspaper, she would see your article.

2.If they should agree to come ,we would be delighted.

Source :perfect English grammar.com in Advanced conditionals Explained (pdf )

  • #4 should be "If it happens to rain". – Senjougahara Hitagi May 17 '16 at 4:58
  • Question has been Edited. Unlike previous, This question is asking for detail analysis of question also differences between sentences with meaning – yubraj May 17 '16 at 9:30
  • 1
    Why are we voting to close this as a duplicate of a question that has already been closed as a duplicate of this one? Won't that cause a tear in the space-time continuum? – ColleenV May 17 '16 at 13:05
  • @Rathony I cleaned it up a little bit and voted to re-open. I think one of these duplicates should be open to get more answers and this one has a higher voted answer (and more detail in the question now that it has been edited) than the other. – ColleenV May 17 '16 at 14:11
  • Thank you very much, but about what previous question ? – yubraj May 17 '16 at 14:20
3

All the sentences are real conditionals.

If it rains ( which is possible, in the future ), I will stay at home.

The following sentences are formal. Should is used in an if-clause to talk about something which is possible but not very likely.

If it should rain, I will stay at home.

Should can also be used in inversion, it adds emphasis.

Should it rain, I will stay at home.

Happen to means by chance and is used in the same situation.

If it happens to (note, there should be-s) rain (which is unlikely ), I will stay at home.

You can use both should and happen to

If it should happen to rain (, I will stay at home.

. *Should, happen to and should happen to * are synonymous constructions and can be used interchangeably in the if-clause with a real conditional. Happen to is colloquial. Your additional sentences are grammatical and express unreal situations. The meaning of should is the same as stated above.

| improve this answer | |
  • Is 'Should' here used just like 'would ' is used in the conditional sentence ? For example: if it would rain ? Or why ? There is also' happen to ' used together with 'should', why ? – yubraj May 17 '16 at 6:47
  • I'm confused here with different sentences structure, sometime should, should happen to , sometime together, various uses – yubraj May 17 '16 at 6:49
  • Would is normally used in the main clause for second(unreal condition referring to present or future ) It expresses improbable, imaginary or untrue situations. There are situations, when would is used in the if-clause, such as colloquial usage,polite requests but that is another question. – V.V. May 17 '16 at 8:11
  • What is the difference between 1. if it rains, i'll stay at home 2. If it should rain, i'll stay at home. – yubraj May 17 '16 at 8:32
  • Again , do you mean ' should' and 'should happen to' are same? – yubraj May 17 '16 at 8:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.