In a composition, I'm trying to make a comparison between three characters who, besides other unfavorable traits, are extremely rude and grabby. Choosing synonyms for the description, I faced the problem of using comparatives and superlatives of the adjectives ill-bred and tight-fisted.

Michael Swan says that some compound adjectives, such as good-looking and well-known, have two possible comparatives and superlatives - better/best-looking/known and more/most good-looking/well-known, but he still says "some compound adjectives", and I have found no other examples.

The question is:

What about the two which trouble me? Would it be correct and natural for a native English speaker to use "the tightest-fisted of the three" or "he's even iller-bred than the two", or will the use of more/the most with the compound adjectives like these be always a safe path?

  • 4
    Just a comment, since I don't have sources or logic really, but as a native speaker "the most tight-fisted" or "more ill-bread" sound natural, while "the tightest-fisted" etc. sound very strange. – Sarah May 23 '16 at 18:02
  • 2
    I agree with the above comment; “ill-bread” sounds quite unnatural as well because the correct spelling of the adjective is “ill-bred”. See here for the comparative and the superlative forms. – user3395 May 23 '16 at 18:22
  • Of course it's ill-bred, thanks for pointing out and for the link. – Victor B. May 23 '16 at 18:41
  • lll traditionally takes worse and worst as its comparative and superlative grades: He's even worse-bred than the others. I have no problem with tighter-fisted, but tightest-fisted is a tongue-twister! – StoneyB on hiatus May 23 '16 at 19:08
  • StoneyB@ Thanks a lot for the tip, it is really useful. Smiling trying the tongue-twister. – Victor B. May 23 '16 at 19:25

First, you asked about other compound adjectives. Allow me to list some:

  • long-lasting
  • far-reaching
  • high-ranked
  • short-term
  • high-level
  • low-price

With regards to the question you pose, whether to use the superlative or more/most construction, @StoneyB is pretty spot-on (pun intended); with respect to writing for comprehension, the more/most construction is a safer bet. However, as long as the proper superlative is being used (such as ill-bred to worse-bred, or tight-fisted to tightest-fisted), use of that form is no less correct.

| improve this answer | |
  • I'd say that it's on a case-by-case basis, and generally it would be more/most except in cases where the other usage is established. All your examples can be used without more/most, but I'm struggling to think of any others. – Euan M Sep 10 '17 at 2:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.