What I want to say is that I write an analysis article about global population growth, and I worked on that with some public data. But I want to emphasis that I read a lot of data. Can I use "many" here?


  • 1
    Something like "During the course of my research I obtained and analysed a large volume of publicly available data" Stick well away from 'many' with data unless your reader has expressed a preference - grammarist.com/usage/data
    – PerryW
    May 28, 2016 at 8:24
  • 1
    This answer to another question might be helpful also: ell.stackexchange.com/a/24032
    – ColleenV
    May 29, 2016 at 3:40

4 Answers 4


This answer has to be a little complicated, because in the English-speaking world, there is a long-running controversy about whether data can be singular, and you should know about this controversy.

Some people say that data can only be plural; its singular is datum. Their reasoning is that data, like many technical terms in English, is borrowed from Latin, and the usual custom in English is to retain the Latin plural for technical terminology. By this reasoning, you should follow grammar like this:

One datum is insignificant. You can only get a statistically significant result if you collect many data.

However, over the last hundred years or so, many people have found it useful to treat data as a singular mass noun. The singular leads the reader to imagine data the way we think of other mass nouns: as something like sand or water, not as something that we count, like cars or houses. By about 1980, singular data became fully accepted in most formal writing. One reason for the change in grammar is that people seldom need to talk about a single datum, and datum became a rare word. Instead, when people need the singular, they follow grammar like this:

One data point, or one piece of data, is insignificant. You must collect much more data than that to get a statistically significant result.

As the word data became more common, people invented new meanings for datum, though only for use in very specialized, technical fields, like geodesy. When people need to make a plural for datum in these new senses of the word, it would be confusing to say data, so they say datums.

Today, the expectation that data is singular is reinforced by new phrases that exploit the singular number, like data type and data warehouse, where data is used as an attributive noun in a way that's customary only when the noun is singular. The common word database also leads people to expect that data is singular.

So, with one caveat, I recommend that you not say many data. Many data would require your reader to think of data as plural. For most English speakers today, using data as a plural is a little jarring—unless you are working in one of the rare fields where datum is still used as the singular of data. A helpful rule of thumb is: If you or your audience would say data point or one piece of data instead of datum, then you should treat data as singular.

These are good:

I analyzed a lot of data. [This is grammatical whether data is singular or plural.]

Much of the data suggests that global population growth is slowing, but a small part of the data raises doubts.

I wrote this article after examining a great deal of data.

In the last sentence, you could substitute a great amount of data, a large volume of data, or other common expressions that go with singular mass nouns. All of these phrases emphasize that you read a lot of data. Also, the verb examine makes that point more clearly than read. Usually we say that computers read data; human beings examine, consider, and analyze data. (Computers are also said to analyze data, but mechanically rather than thoughtfully.)

Some sources for data, such as public databases, are count nouns and should be plural:

I examined many public databases.

Here is the one caveat: Some people, a minority today, are sticklers for the older usage. Often these people work in positions of authority in organizations that uphold traditions, like schools and governments. In countries where English is not the native language, older forms are often taught, and correct modern usage is sometimes marked wrong on exams. So, know your audience. If your audience wants plural data, give them plural data. If you don't have specific information that your audience insists on the older grammar, then use singular data and avoid many.

  • 3
    I wish I could upvote this twice: once for the data as a mass noun part, and once for the computers read data, people analyze it part. Both are great points.
    – J.R.
    May 29, 2016 at 16:39
  • "I recommend that you not say". I liked your reply, but I can't stop asking myself whether that "strange" construction (with "not" instead of "don't) could be correct. Could you clarify if that expression was intentional?
    – lnjuanj
    May 29, 2016 at 17:22
  • @lnjuanj It was intentional, for two reasons: (1) That's the ordinary way to negate the subjunctive mood in AmE. If you're from England, it might seem unfamiliar. Search for "recommend that you not" for many examples and some articles discussing the transatlantic difference. (2) I'm guessing that this construction is a little easier for non-natives to understand, since it lacks "do". I thought the simple negation of the subjunctive might help the main point stand out a little better amidst the caveat and discussion of changing usage.
    – Ben Kovitz
    May 30, 2016 at 13:30
  • Hi, thanks for your response. I'm not English, just learning :) I mostly read in English and hadn't ever seen that construction. Your first reason has helped me discover something new: Thanks a lot! About the second reason... I'm Spanish and we use subjunctives a lot, but they teach British English here, so I guess that's why I feel more comfortable with the "don't" construction. Otherwise, Spanish people would be happier using those subjunctives in English too ;)
    – lnjuanj
    May 30, 2016 at 15:22
  • @lnjuanj Well, come to America and enjoy our subjunctive mood! :) Also, you might find this tag interesting.
    – Ben Kovitz
    May 30, 2016 at 15:34

"Many" doesn't work here because it's describing a singular noun. "Data" can't be "many" because it's just one thing.

If you said "I wrote this article after reading many books" it would be appropriate, because "books" is plural and when there are multiples of something, you can have many of them.

"I wrote this article after reading a lot of data" is a simple way of saying what you're intending to.

  • 2
    Actually, "data" is the plural of "datum". Not so long ago, people fought about whether "data" could be extended to serve as a singular mass noun. That usage is now commonly accepted even in formal writing, but plural "data" is still established, grammatical English. Google "many data" and you'll see lots of articles about this. Here is typical contemporary usage of plural "data".
    – Ben Kovitz
    May 28, 2016 at 8:52
  • 2
    "A lot of..." applies to plural nouns and uncountable things like water and red. So using the same example as in the answer, you can say "a lot of books", but not "a lot of book". That's why you can say "a lot of data" but not "a lot of datum".
    – nnnnnn
    May 28, 2016 at 9:58
  • 1
    @BenKovitz - Sorry, but it doesn't work in this case. "I read a datum" would use the singular form of data, but it simply wouldn't make much sense. One might say "I read a single datum from the list", but the unmodified datum use would sound very odd. May 29, 2016 at 4:58
  • @WhatRoughBeast Indeed people don't usually say "datum" anymore. But if you use "data" in the plural, that's the corresponding singular. I have encountered this in real literature and speech, and said it myself, but only in very technical settings. "The reader reads the next datum…"; examples. After reading the answers and comments so far, I'm now thinking that a good rule of thumb might be, "If you don't know what a datum is, you don't know what plural data is—and so you shouldn't use either word."
    – Ben Kovitz
    May 29, 2016 at 5:32
  • 1
    pixiesquisher, are you a native speaker of English? If so, can you tell me where you're from and roughly how old you are? Your answer might be informative as an illustration of different understanding of the grammatical number of data among different fluent speakers. If you're not a native speaker, can you shed some light on how you came to understand data as "just one thing"?
    – Ben Kovitz
    May 30, 2016 at 14:08

I wrote this article after reading many data

A datum is a unit of collected information. Here you are saying you have read many sets of collected information - in the sense of taking readings from an instrument, going through a process to sample and read the state of something, etc.

But I want to emphasis that I read a lot of data

Right here, you are expressing it in the way many would expect to hear it. I read a lot of data means you read a lot of articles or lists of data.

One problem is that reading data implies you are looking at lists of numbers, but doing nothing further. So even this:

I wrote this article after reading a lot of data

can come off as somewhat "incomplete" because you really should do more with data than just read it. This is probably better:

I wrote this article after analyzing a lot of data


As @BenKovits commented, data is originally a plural form of datum.

The word "data" is defined as a mass noun in Oxford Online Dictionary and it would be better to use "much" than "many" based on this definition. The linked Ngram Viewer, collected much data vs collected many data, seems to favor "much data" over "many data", but there is no much difference. It would not be incorrect to use "many data". It will depend on how you perceive the word.

As @PerryW commented, using "a large amount of data" or "a large volume of data" would be a good alternative.

Merriam-Webster confirms that the word data could be used as a singular or plural noun in construction. The word datum is not broaldy used in contemporary English.

  • 1
    -1 it would not be incorrect to use "many data" I must disagree. I have never heard or read "many data", and "correct" is what people say, not what they "can say" according to some abstract rule. Even "these data" is rare compared to "this data". The plural is perceived as pedantry, even by the well-educated.
    – TimR
    May 28, 2016 at 15:29
  • 1
    @TRomano Are you saying that the sentence in the book written by two British scholars is incorrect? It might not be more broadly used than "collected much data", but I don't see the problem with the sentence. Do you? I deleted the first Ngram as "many data" are used as an attributive phrase in some cases.
    – user24743
    May 28, 2016 at 15:43
  • 1
    I'm saying that "many data" is a pedanticism. I can find only a handful of times when it is used.
    – TimR
    May 28, 2016 at 16:04
  • 1
    I would explain that as the likely result of editorial intervention. One rarely hears "these data" in natural conversation. One hears "this data shows" far more often than "these data show" even by speakers who would write "these data show". In formal contexts, they will treat "data" as plural because they know it's "correct" to do so, but in informal contexts they will often do as the average speaker does.
    – TimR
    May 28, 2016 at 16:18
  • 1
    @TRomano That's interesting! One possible explanation is that there are very few hits. But I think a more likely explanation is that the momentum to treat "data" as singular started long ago, because even when it was clearly plural, there were many fewer occasions to say "datum". Compare this and this. I don't think we disagree about the phony and pedantic sound that "many data" usually has today. But I do think that plural "data" has legitimate, non-pretentious currency in some (unusual) settings.
    – Ben Kovitz
    May 29, 2016 at 6:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .