So, I was scrolling through my facebook news feed when I came across a status someone had put up that read "I get road rage walking behind people." .

Now, the "walking behind people" part modifies the "I" if i'm not wrong. So, wouldn't there be a comma following the word rage?

  • Care to elaborate on what you mean by wouldn't?
    – TimR
    Jun 8, 2016 at 12:06
  • @TRomano - I think the poster just means "Shouldn't there be a comma...?"
    – stangdon
    Jun 8, 2016 at 12:08
  • @stangdon: Wouldn't the Facebook copy editors have prevented such an error?
    – TimR
    Jun 8, 2016 at 12:09
  • I think it is absurd to be discussing punctuation on a Facebook news feed.
    – TimR
    Jun 8, 2016 at 12:10
  • 3
    In my opinion the original sentence is fine without a comma. (Facebook copy editors? I can't tell if @TRomano is joking.)
    – nnnnnn
    Jun 8, 2016 at 12:14

1 Answer 1


That post technically contains a misplaced modifier so punctuation is not really relevant. In that sentence, walking behind people functions as an adjective and modifies I. Therefore, it should be placed closer to I to clarify that it modifies I.

As written, walking behind people technically is describing rage. Note that it does not make sense to describe rage as walking so English speakers will assume walking behind people modifies I and not misunderstand the meaning. However, consider the following sentence:

I saw a girl walking down the street.

In this sentence, both girl and I can potentially be walking so you have to rely on grammar rather than the meaning of the words to figure out who is walking. Girl is being modified because is it closer to walking down the street.

If you wanted to clarify that I was walking, you have to invert the word order:

Walking down the street, I saw a girl.

So in proper English, the post above should be written:

Walking behind people, I get road rage.

Now just as a final note, the sentence I wrote above is completely correct and the one in the post is not. However, the correct sentence differs from the incorrect one in that it emphasizes walking behind people. The incorrect one is more of a simple statement with walking behind people thrown in as an afterthought.

  • In my opinion the original sentence has a vibe that complements the writer's meaning.
    – nnnnnn
    Jun 8, 2016 at 13:05
  • You guys are brutal. Is something in this answer not correct?
    – G-Cam
    Jun 8, 2016 at 13:22
  • 1
    Well I didn't down-vote, but I don't agree with your conclusion. In my opinion the original sentence emphasises that the (metaphorical) road rage happens while walking behind people - I don't think that comes across as an afterthought.
    – nnnnnn
    Jun 8, 2016 at 15:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .