7
  1. A cookie in the shape of a foot.
  2. A cookie in the shape of foot.

Is foot without an article OK? If so, what does it mean exactly?

10

In your examples

A cookie in the shape of a foot.

is grammatically correct

here

A cookie in the shape of foot.

is grammatically incorrect, however

A cookie in the shape of feet.

is grammatically correct and could mean a single cookie which looks like more than one foot

here

or multiple feet made from a single type of cookie (dough)

Fookies can be made from a traditional sugar cookie recipe.

here

  • 2
    I'm impressed -- it would never have occurred to me to look for illustrations! – StoneyB on hiatus Jun 29 '16 at 10:33
  • 1
    I'm more than impressed; I'm flabbergasted. How on Earth did @Peter find a photograph of a cookie die in the shape of two feet! Apparently he has such things just lying around in case they are needed someday. Mirabile dictu! – P. E. Dant Jun 30 '16 at 5:00
2

No, 2. doesn't seem correct. It sounds strange. I think this is because this "foot" is unspecified. So we need an article to signal that it is unspecified. By using the article a, it implies that the cookie has the general shape of a foot--any foot, a typical foot.

a cookie in the shape of a foot.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.