Is it right to say: "Lazy students aren't worth of free education" or "Lazy students aren't worth free education"?

  • 1
    You'd probably be better off using "Lazy students aren't worthy of free education"... I have a feeling that's what you mean. – Catija Jun 30 '16 at 19:24


Lazy students aren't worth of free education

doesn't mean anything to me.

If I heard

  1. Lazy students aren't worth free education

from a native speaker, then I would understand it to mean

  1. Lazy student are not worthy of a free education


  1. It is not worth the effort to give lazy students free education.

So, in my opinion, if your goal was to try to sound like a native speaker and you used 1., then congratulations, I think you did a fine job. In fact, I would probably say 1.

If this was not your goal, then try to rephrase 1. to convey your true meaning.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.