English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Some different sentences use for in a manner distinct from the usual:
- I was in for a rude shock in college.
- You are good at it for a girl.
- She does it because for you.
The 3rd seems to be a bit weird.
Also, there are some sentences which seem to be missing the preposition for ,
- Draw (for) me some money.
The 'draw' refers to the painting.
Example 1: In for is an idiom, which functions as a predicative adjective that takes an object. It means "expected to receive" - the thing to be received is usually unwelcome, but not always.
Example 2: This is the OED's meaning 27 for 'for': " 27. In proportion to, considering; considering the nature or capacity of; considering what he, she, or it is, or that he, etc. is so and so." It gives an example from 1753: " A man of an excellent character for a Lawyer."
Example 3: This is deviant. I know of no variety of English in which this is grammatical.
Example 4: This is a standard pattern for ditransitive verbs: the indirect object may either come after the direct object, with a preposition:
Draw some money for me.
or precede the direct object without a preposition:
Draw me some money.
The typical indirect object has preposition "to", but examples with "for" are very common. In fact, as in this case, a "for" phrase can be added to many predicates with benefactive sense, and this pattern is then available:
He baked a cake.
He baked a cake for me.
He baked me a cake.
