Do the following sentences work with or without the prepositions?

This is a good place to stay (at).

This is a good place to live (in).


I believe the prepositions would only be required when dealing with a specific noun.

For example: This is a good HOUSE to stay (in/at(in sounds more natural to me))

Or: This is a good HOUSE to live in.

Your two sentences are proper, no prepositions required.


They work both with and without the prepositions.

You'll find many articles with a search of "end sentence with preposition" on how teachers used to say this was wrong, but that the "old rule" of never ending a sentence with a preposition is a Latin grammar concept attempted to be forced into English's Germanic grammar roots, and therefore it's not really a big deal.

It helps clarify things as well. For example, This is a good place to live - we're not sure if you mean the neighboorhood, country, house, or what type of place, but by saying This is a good place to live in, it's clearer you probably mean a house or at least something with a roof.

  • A city, for instance, is a place to live in aswell. However, it is much less common.
    – MorganFR
    Jul 28 '16 at 14:05
  • 1
    @LawrenceC Quibbling here, slightly, but you might be able to come up with a better example than This is a good place to live in. A localism, maybe, but I often hear Lower Rat Rapids is a good place to live in and similiar. Jul 29 '16 at 1:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.