It’s all just lists.
The author states "the question is" and then poses a list of two question (one is misinformed in the original posting).
Each question is a fully formed sentence.
The first question asks about a list of "X-preserving" actions.
The second question "are we inclined to maintain...." is followed by a list of "that" clauses, and the second contains a list of "without" phrases.
So while the author states "the question is", I count 9 different questions.
The question is:
(Q1) "how far an opinion is
- life-furthering,
- life- preserving,
- species-preserving,
- perhaps species-rearing,"
and
(Q2) "
we areare we fundamentally inclined to maintain
- that the falsest opinions (to which the synthetic judgments a priori belong), are the most indispensable to us,
- that (
- without a recognition of logical fictions,
- without a comparison of reality with the purely IMAGINED world of the absolute and immutable,
- without a constant counterfeiting of the world by means of numbers, ) man could not live
- that the renunciation of false opinions would be a renunciation of life, a negation of life."
