Journals and other publishers may have their own in-house guidelines when it comes to usage and grammar. Many follow the top style guides: APA, CMS, and MLA. 

What you have linked in the comments, is a guide specific to your graduate school, which may or may not follow one of the top three style guides. Some universities even make up their own guides, which are usually very generic and less comprehensive than the top three. 

Note that university guides may also be inconsistent sometimes (i.e., they take certain things from APA and certain things from CMS and then put them together). And this is why you will rarely find scholarly publications that have exactly the same usage, grammar, and overall style as your university guide. 

Now to address your specific concern, here's what Chicago Manual of Style says (17th ed.): 

>**Usage and Grammar**  
>Q. Chicago recommends using the present tense when discussing the actions of characters in literature. But I often face questions about verb tense when discussing the actions of authors themselves, particularly in academic writing. Is it correct to say, “Blomley (2004) argues that property claims can be used toward ends that are both oppressive and emancipatory,” or should I instead render the verb in the past tense? Would the answer change if Blomley had written his book in, say, 1867?
>
>A. Regardless of how long ago the author wrote, the “historic present” is commonly used in just this type of context. If you want to emphasize the past, however—perhaps to contrast it with the present—the past tense works well. Absolute consistency needn’t be a goal in a long manuscript, but don’t mix tenses near each other. [Source][1]

Another one:

>**Citation, Documentation of Sources**  
>Q. Dear Chicago, what verb tense do you recommend for the literature review section of a scholarly article? APA insists on the past tense, arguing that any work included in a literature review was obviously published in the past. People writing about English literature, on the other hand, discuss works in the present tense because readers always experience the book in the present. I’m editing a Canadian public policy journal, and the author uses the present tense to discuss works published ten or fifteen years ago. Should I change these tenses to the present perfect? The journal has no in-house rule on this.
>
>A. Since the use of the present tense in literature reviews is widely accepted, and since any decision about where to cut off “past” from “present” literature would have to be arbitrary, using the present tense for everything is a fine option. You shouldn’t worry about using it if a journal doesn’t express a preference. [Source][2]


And another one:

>**Usage and Grammar**  
>Q. When writing about an author’s work, do you write in the past or present tense? Example: The author argues (argued) that it was the correct choice. Please help. Thanks.
>
>A. Different kinds of writing have different conventions. In academic writing, it’s not wrong to use the past tense when quoting written works, but it’s conventional to use the “historical present,” even when the author is dead (Heraclitus says, “No one steps into the same river twice”) ... [Source][3]

It is possible that the top-class published journals that you are referring to did not follow the APA style guide, which is the source material for your university's guideline.

>**APA**  
>...   
>
>**Describing a method or procedure**  
>  
>***Simple past tense***  
>
> - The participants **were** interviewed ...  
>
>***Present perfect tense***  
>
> - Other researchers **have followed** a similar procedure.

Source: [Use of verb tenses in APA, Chicago and MLA styles][4] 


  [1]: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Usage/faq0187.html
  [2]: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Documentation/faq0200.html
  [3]: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Usage/faq0047.html
  [4]: https://owll.massey.ac.nz/academic-writing/verb-tense.php