1

Both are correct. But here it's just a matter of time frame: "had been vs was." had been - expresses the duration of the action ( it had been there [for/before some time] ); was - on the other hand, is a simple tense ( it is not specified whether the action was ongoing); That said, neither can be regarded more or less correct. It mainly depends ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible