5 votes
Accepted

Sequence of tenses (the present perfect and the past simple

Yes, (2) is correct (if the review hasn't been finished yet). (1) doesn't make sense because the past simple doesn't go with now. If the report has already been written you would have to say After a ...
Kate Bunting's user avatar
  • 49.4k
3 votes

The fact that she "would/will" come to see me on Friday bothered me. - "the fact that..." follows the rule of sequence of tense?

If the 'bothering' happened last week, presumably you mean that the visit was last Friday, so would is appropriate. (It was in the future then but is now in the past.) We would only use will if the ...
Kate Bunting's user avatar
  • 49.4k
2 votes

Confused about tenses in conditionals

The idea of "zeroth, first, second, third" conditionals is a simplification made for children learning English as a second language. These are not used in lessons for native-speaking ...
James K's user avatar
  • 202k
2 votes
Accepted

Does "all morning" mean that the morning is over?

The most natural option (in my opinion) is "It's been there all morning". If the couple are going out for the day, it is presumably still morning. (If it is now afternoon, the cashier would ...
Kate Bunting's user avatar
  • 49.4k
2 votes

Is "I heard old war drums beat." from the Eric Bogle's song "Welcome Home" grammatical?

The way some verbs can be used both as transitive and and (the former, in your example of beating drums) has been discussed in this case: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/95805/this-wine-is-...
Maria A.'s user avatar
  • 177
2 votes
Accepted

I realized half an hour ago that it ____ time to go to my home country

Both options are possible, by the usual backshifting rules. The past tense "it was time" is the backshifted form. The present tense "it is time" is valid, if it continues to be &...
James K's user avatar
  • 202k
2 votes

"Most people had come to accept that war <was> <would be> inevitable."

The past perfect refers to a time before whenever the simple past time is. That sentence would only occur in a context where that simple past time is already clear -- let's say, August 1939. With this ...
gotube's user avatar
  • 48.8k
2 votes
Accepted

What Is the Scope of the Past Perfect?

You have misunderstood the use of the past perfect. Firstly it is rare. As it is the last major tense form to be learned, some advanced learners overuse it. The past perfect is used to mark an action ...
James K's user avatar
  • 202k
2 votes
Accepted

The day after/before - the choice of tenses

There is quite a lot of fairly confusing tense and generally "time" in that quote. It might make more sense in context but taken out of context it seems muddled. There is "now" (...
James K's user avatar
  • 202k
1 vote
Accepted

Betty took two lumps, then saying, 'Well,Happy Birthday again'

In the sentence: Betty took two lumps, then saying, 'Well, Happy Birthday again.' We know from context (the word "took") that this is happening in the past. So, using the phrase "then ...
BigMistake's user avatar
  • 1,112
1 vote

Should we check the 'tense agreement'? If so, what' the difference in the meaning?

Yes, both of your sentences are correct. In fact, your second sentence is arguably better than the textbook answer. In this exercise, we are rewriting active sentences in the passive voice, removing ...
gotube's user avatar
  • 48.8k
1 vote

What to use "Have or Did"

English has several verb forms that can be used to talk about the past. The two that you mention is the perfect aspect "Have you met" and the past tense (or preterite tense) "Did you ...
James K's user avatar
  • 202k
1 vote

What to use "Have or Did"

Colloquially, they're almost equivalent. The difference being that the continual tense would be more likely to be used while in the act of actually introducing someone. "Joe, have you met the ...
DrMoishe Pippik's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Which tense I do have to use if a main clause is in past simple tense and a subordinate clause is linked by the word before?

OP's suggested sentence is not syntactically valid. The second verb can't be Present Perfect. If you want to use a Perfect form, it must be Past Perfect... My comment was written... ...before I had ...
FumbleFingers's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Sequence of verbs: present perfect after past simple

You're right that the sentence "You didn't answer the doorbell when I rang, so you must have gone to work early." is an exception to the typical past simple -> past perfect sequence. ...
Paul Lake's user avatar
1 vote

I thought he would have been

Each of example sentences a, b, c, and d is grammatically valid. Each is reasonably understandable by a fluent speaker. However the construction "* I thought he would have* used in a thru c is in ...
David Siegel's user avatar
  • 40.9k

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible