0

I see the sentence in the book:I don't believe that is who betrayed me..

I can not understand its meaning and I think it is wrong. Am I right?

Improve this question
2
  • 2
    It's not incorrect.
    – Jack O'Flaherty
    Commented Aug 26, 2020 at 14:51
  • 1
    Nor would it be incorrect if it included a "relativizer" that AS WELL AS a "pronominal" one: I don't believe that that is who betrayed me. Note that in speech those two highlighted terms would normally be treated very differently. The initial relativizer would only have an unstressed neutral vowel / schwa, whereas the pronoun would be fully articulated and given stress.
    – FumbleFingers
    Commented Aug 26, 2020 at 14:58

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

The construction is idiomatic and commonplace. It is a short form of saying:

I don't believe that (person) is (the individual) who betrayed me.

In this instance that is being used as a pronoun to refer to the person concerned.

You could insert a second that by saying:

I don't believe that (conjunction) that (pronoun) is (the individual) who betrayed me.
But this is unnecessary. In both spoken and written English, the first that is commonly omitted.

You will frequently come across constructions such as:

I don't believe that's who did it.
I don't believe that's the man responsible.
I don't believe that's who you are.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .