3

This is a quote from a book:

Leibniz was both philosopher and mathematician.

To me it should be "both a philosopher and (a) mathematician." Is the article a optionall after both? Does both includes a?

  • Searched on authentic sites, both practices are okay - with or without articles. But it's a thought provoking question. +1 – Maulik V Aug 1 '14 at 5:11
3

If he is just one of them:

Leibniz was a philosopher.

then a is necessary. But when he is both:

Leibniz was both philosopher and mathematician.

then he is two things (philosopher and mathematician), so a is not appropriate.
However, as you mentioned you could say;

Leibniz was both a philosopher and a mathematician.

which treats each one separately. I believe this would be technically correct.

| improve this answer | |
  • Can I leave out both? Is it grammatically correct: "He was philosopher and mathematician"? – Graduate Aug 1 '14 at 4:40
  • 1
    Then I think you need both "a"s in there. "He was a philosopher and a mathematician". – user3169 Aug 1 '14 at 16:08
2

That sentence is grammatically correct, although it would be a bit clearer if the a were included. Both can include a, although it is more common to see them used together, as it typically clarifies the sentence.

A more common usage of both by itself might be, for example, in a eulogy. Something like "I knew him as both Grandfather and friend." In this case, the addition of an article would not serve to clarify the sentence or make it more readable.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.