The question from Study Guide in Essential Grammar in Use was:

Dave _____________ in a factory. Now he works in a supermarket.

a. working / b. works / c. worked / d. use to work / e. used to work

I know the answer is "e. used to work", but is "c. worked" seriously wrong?

Doesn't the sentence "Dave used to work in a factory" mean "Dave worked in a factory before but now he doesn't"?

Then I don't understand why the sentence "Dave worked in a factory" can't be an answer as well.

What's so different between "Dave used to work in a factory. Now he works in a supermarket" and "Dave worked in a factory. Now he works in a supermarket"?

  • 3
    While "worked" is a grammatically correct answer, it's not the best answer. Often these questions include less-than-perfect answers to see if you can pick out the best one
    – gotube
    Oct 23, 2022 at 17:19

1 Answer 1


While it's not strictly wrong, there are subtle reasons why it's unnatural or likely to be misinterpreted.

The important component is the contrast. "Used to" is a very effective and common way of signalling that the first sentence is not a self-contained thought, but is the first half of the contrast completed by "now". But — as so often ends up happening in language! — not using a marker like "used to" doesn't leave it ambiguous as to whether there's a contrast; its absence suggests a conscious choice to express a self-contained thought.

Why is this important? Because "David worked in a factory" as a self-contained thought expresses to me that it was the main occupation of his working life, and he is now either (chronically) unemployed, retired, or dead.

The present perfect is not among the options your study guide gives. It too would work, because it closes off the "entire working life" reading by implicitly contrasting the past with the present. This is one of the main functions of the present perfect.

You could also create the contrast by adding words like "David worked in factory before / until 20XX / in his early years" or another qualification that bounds the timeframe when he worked in the factory. If I were to say "worked" on its own, I would emphasize the word, over-articulating the "ed" to highlight the past tense. (In this scenario it'd seem like I was correcting someone who believed that he still worked in a factory.)

But the clearest, easiest, most common contrast is still "used to".

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .