2

I couldn't figure out the logic of this sentence. I heard it in a dialogue in a film.I have never seen such a pattern in grammar books. But as a result of my researches, I saw that it was examined in the subject of "it cleft". but unfortunately I did not understand this pattern again.I would be very happy if you could help me.

'' i know what it is you need ??? ''

5
  • I know who it is you hired. Very common construction.
    – TimR
    Commented Nov 23, 2023 at 17:33
  • Would it be clearer if the optional "that" were included? I know what it is that you need.
    – Colin Fine
    Commented Nov 23, 2023 at 17:42
  • Including optional it is [that] in the cited context is a relatively uncommon (but certainly not rare) stylistic choice. The effect of which is to emphasize the significance of the thing known, since it's effectively been referenced twice (initially by what, then again by it). Commented Nov 23, 2023 at 19:04
  • What needs explanation is "it is".
    – TimR
    Commented Nov 23, 2023 at 19:21
  • I think that to some extent, the sequence what it is has become "grammaticalized" so that it's now almost seen as a complete syntactic unit all on its own. And that's part of what encourages the cited use. Another effect of this process is that if we're see those three words as "self-contained", it's easier to understand the increasing tendency to repeat the verb, in What it is is that those three words have taken on a life of their own, beyond the reach of pedants. Commented Nov 23, 2023 at 20:29

2 Answers 2

2

Suppose you have the following sentence:

(1) You need food.

If we turn this sentence into an it-cleft, it becomes:

(2) It is food that you need.

And if we turn this it-cleft into a "wh- question," we get:

(3) What is it that you need?

Here, in (3), we have what's called "subject-auxiliary inversion"—the auxiliary (is) moves to a position that precedes the subject (it). But if we embed a wh- question into a declarative sentence, there is no inversion (at least in Standard English). So, if we embed (3) into a declarative sentence, we would get something like (4), where there is no inversion:

(4) I know what it is that you need.

The complementizer (that) is optional in this sentence, so we can change this to:

(4') I know what it is you need.

And that's basically the sentence you were asking about, or at least a declarative version of it. Depending on the intonation (or punctuation in writing), the sentence in (4') can become a question without any change in word order, in which case it may mean what DrMoishe Pippik suggested in an earlier answer: "Do you think that I know what it is that you need??"

0

Consider the clause, "it is what you need." Taken as a sentence, it's easily understood -- the item referred to by "it" is an item that you need.

Inverting the order to, "what is it you need?" makes it a question.

Looking at the whole, "I know what it is you need," would be a simple statement that I know the item you need.

Ah! But with the reiterated question marks, the speaker is asking, "I know what it is you need???" I.E., "Do you think that I know what it is that you need???"

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .