When reading this post:


I wasn't sure what the last 3 sentences actually are stylistic about.

So the question is as the title states.

What is the expressing difference between We ain't and We are not?

  • aint can be used as am not, are not, is not, have not, and has not. BTW, aint is informal while are not is the version you must use in a formal writing. – mok Apr 4 '16 at 11:03
  • @mok so it is exactly the same thing? And so one just uses it to save spoken/written characters? Would this say out anything about the characters in the linked dialouge? When one keeps saying ain't while the other says are not? – Zaibis Apr 4 '16 at 11:08
  • As far as I know they mean the same. But, I have no idea why someone insists on using aint. – mok Apr 4 '16 at 11:14

Ain't is a regional dialect word (Cockney, East London, UK- 1706) that started off as a contraction of am not, then was used to replace is not, has not and a few other things. It is relatively common in the UK and in the US. There are other regional variations in the UK- aiy is used in the Black Country and bain't is used in the West of England.

These words are widely used in novels to suggest that a character lacks education: I suspect that's the point of the quote that you referred to.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.