Skip to main content
English Language Learners

Return to Question

Became Hot Network Question
added 23 characters in body
Source Link
Cheng
Cheng
  • 195
  • 1
  • 8

(1) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment. This damage leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(2) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, which leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(3) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, leading to a loss of biodiversity.

Sentence (3) seems to lack the relative pronoun 'which' (compare to (2)). Is (2) supposed to be better than (3), or is (3) correct too?

(1) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment. This damage leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(2) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, which leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(3) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, leading to a loss of biodiversity.

Sentence (3) seems to lack the relative pronoun 'which' (compare to (2)). Is (2) supposed to be better than (3)?

(1) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment. This damage leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(2) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, which leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(3) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, leading to a loss of biodiversity.

Sentence (3) seems to lack the relative pronoun 'which' (compare to (2)). Is (2) supposed to be better than (3), or is (3) correct too?

Source Link
Cheng
Cheng
  • 195
  • 1
  • 8

Is relative pronoun 'which' missing?

(1) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment. This damage leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(2) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, which leads to a loss of biodiversity.

(3) This has caused a lot of damage to the environment, leading to a loss of biodiversity.

Sentence (3) seems to lack the relative pronoun 'which' (compare to (2)). Is (2) supposed to be better than (3)?