I'd like to ask what you understand from the following sentences, which I found randomly on the Internet
- Rooftop solar isn’t quite as great as you thought it was (but it’s still pretty great)
- The Galaxy S7 isn't quite as tough as the iPhone 6s
http://www.techinsider.io/galaxy-s7-vs-iphone-6s-toughness-tests-2016-3
- A rose, isn't quite as beautiful as it once was, when after its thorn pricks you.
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/891481-a-rose-isn-t-quite-as-beautiful-as-it-once-was
In my understanding from the sentences above that there is a difference between the items compared but this distance is not too much, it is not small either. When I read the second sentence I assume, I don't know why, iPhone is tougher to some extent that gives a value to the product so I would prefer to buy iphone. But grammar resources say the difference is insignificant. There are not many resources tough.
http://www.eltbase.com/notes.php?id=549
And I'd like to ask what you would understand if I wrote it in positive form.
The Galaxy S7 is quite as tough as the iPhone 6s.
This time it sounds for me both are almost equally tough.But it doesn't not clear which one tougher.This doesn't matter because the difference is insignificant.
And another scenario :
Product A: $99
Product B: $100
Which one more correct to say ( or can we say correct just by choosing one another)
Product A is quite as expensive as B.
Product A is not quite as expensive as B.