Which is more natural?

The easiest thing to do is to call for a taxi


The easiest thing to do is call for a taxi

And what do you call this to in grammar terms if any?


They're both acceptable. Searching the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), I find:

  thing to do is to [V*]         208 results
  thing to do is [V*]            93 results

I find similar results searching the British National Corpus (BNC):

  thing to do is to [V*]         67 results
  thing to do is [V*]            18 results

As you can see, we find plenty of examples both with and without to, but the version with to is somewhat more common in both American and British English. In both versions, the complement of be is an infinitival clause, so the verb appears in its plain form (call in your example).

In this context, to is an infinitive marker. It's usually required in this sort of sentence:

1a. What I want is [to call for a taxi].
1b. *What I want is [call for a taxi].  ← ungrammatical

But if the subject noun phrase contains a subordinate clause with do, as in your example, it's optional:

2a. The thing to do is [to call for a taxi].
2b. The thing to do is [call for a taxi].

Both are grammatical, and there's no difference in meaning. The version with to seems to be a bit more common

By the way, in The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language on p.1255, Rodney Huddleston gives the rule as follows:

The bare infinitival is restricted to cases where the subject NP contains do in a relative clause[.]

But this rule doesn't seem to be quite right because to is optional in your example as well, as we can see from the corpus evidence above, so in this answer I've tweaked the rule to use the more general term "subordinate clause" rather than "relative clause".

For the moment, I believe this is more accurate, but you can do further research if you'd like to try to nail it down.


  1. In the searches shown above, [V*] is a part-of-speech tag representing "any verb". You'll have to scroll down on the results pages if you want to see the totals. If you'd like to see actual examples of usage, click some of the matching phrases; the examples will appear in the bottom right.

  2. In this answer, the * symbol marks an utterance as ungrammatical in Standard English.

  • Thank you @snailboat. I was wondering which one you usually use or prefer.
    – learner
    Oct 10 '14 at 19:37
  • 1
    @learner I would probably say to.
    – user230
    Oct 10 '14 at 19:45

I've encountered this problem twice:

Wikipedia cited a quote by Stephen Hawking that All one can do is find which mathematical models describe the universe we live in.

Prof. Anne Aly in a Q&A TV show used the same pattern: The first thing that they do with their propaganda is tell young people to reject their Australia citizenship, to reject their Australia identity.

I thought it's acceptable but sounds like a misspoken, and ungrammatical.

  • It's grammatical and idiomatic. All we can do now is wait. The first thing she does is make a cup of tea. Jul 13 '16 at 12:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .