2

North of the Pyrenees Mountains, the natterjack toad offers a good example of hibernation, passing the winter dug deep into sandy ground.

I expect this sentence to be like this:

North of the Pyrenees Mountains, the natterjack toad offers a good example of hibernation, passing the winter by digging deep into sandy ground.

1-Is my sentence correct?

2-Why does the author use dug in the sentence?

Source:

1- Google Book

2- Amphibians (Last paragraph)

1 Answer 1

2

With telic verbs—verbs which designate an action which ends in a change of state or position—it is very common for the past-participle form to be employed as a locative adjunct meaning "in the attained state or position".

In this case dig in(to) has a telic sense: the toad digs a hole in the sandy ground with the goal of positioning itself at the bottom. When it has completed that activity, it is dug in. Exactly the same expression is often used of soldiers in trenches:

The troops spent a cold, pitiless Christmas dug in at Bastogne, until a successful counterattack turned back the German offensive. —source

Your rewrite is different: the present-participle form digging designates the activity of digging rather than the attained goal of the activity.

2
  • So, I can see it in this way: "The natterjack toad passes the winter dug deep into" . moreover, "Dug into" is a adjective. Am I right? And, in this sentence, "The natterjack toad passes the winter by digging deep into.", digging is gerund (and noun). Right? (I've gotten the semantic difference between these two.)
    – Anfi
    Commented Jul 24, 2016 at 18:43
  • 1
    @AlirezaN. You got it. Participles are forms which act simultaneously as verbs and adjectives, a gerund is a form which acts simultaneously as a verb and a noun. Into X is a preposition phrase which acts as the complement to dug. Commented Jul 24, 2016 at 18:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .