0

I read a sentence in "The Hindu" which was:

Whiile Mr Modi said that Congress is trying to erase evidence on the attack.....

My personal preference would be to use "of" instead of "on" after the word "evidence".

3
  • It's a mistake. It has to be "evidence of" something. You should understand by now that The Hindu often has small mistakes.
    – jonathanjo
    May 20 '19 at 18:27
  • @Kelvin, You are correct. You can post an answer to your own question :) May 20 '19 at 19:08
  • But I get that sense of confirmation only from you guys. ☺☺
    – Kelvin
    May 21 '19 at 2:16
1

"Evidence of" [something] is correct. You should say 'evidence of the attack' rather than 'evidence on the attack'.

There is a possible use of "evidence on", in the context of "I've got evidence on you" (colloquial) which means something like: I know something incriminating about you [and I'm threatening to use it against you].

0

If Congress is pretending that the attack never happened, evidence of is correct, and I would not use any other phrase.

If Congress concedes that there was an attack, but is trying to suppress the details and shift blame, I might use evidence on; but I'd prefer evidence relating to as clearer, or at least more idiomatic (to an American).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.