If a person has fought in a war, how do you describe them? Is 'to have combat experience' okay? It, I guess, wouldn't work with 'military experience' since it just means that a person has served in the military, not that he or she actually participated in a war battle. Don't suggest 'veteran'. It means, according to Lexico, "an ex-member of the armed forces", not exactly what I'm looking for
1 Answer
Although you don't want veteran as an answer, that is what's commonly used. While a veteran isn't necessarily somebody who actually fought, it's commonly thought of that way, despite its definition.
However, the specific term for somebody who's a veteran and who saw combat is combat veteran.
From "What is a Combat Veteran?" at Charlie Company:
The American War Library states:
What is a Veteran? – A veteran is defined by federal law, moral code and military service as “Any, Any, Any”… A military veteran is Any person who served for Any length of time in Any military service branch.
What is a War Veteran? – A war veteran is Any GI (Government Issue) ordered to foreign soil or waters to participate in direct or support activity against an enemy. The operant condition: Any GI sent in harm’s way.
What is a Combat Veteran? – A combat veteran is Any GI who experiences any level of hostility for any duration resulting from offensive, defensive or friendly fire military action involving a real or perceived enemy in any foreign theater. Wartime medals also define various levels of individual combat involvement, sacrifice and/or valor.
So, if you're being precise, the term you want is combat veteran.
-
What if I want a broader term/phrase? To include not only retired but also current members of armed forces Commented May 13, 2020 at 14:32
-
@SergeyZolotarev They are still combat veterans. But if you have to make the difference explicit, they could be described as active duty combat veterans, as opposed to retired combat veterans. Commented May 13, 2020 at 14:42