0

The following two sentences seem redundant. How do I combine them into a single sentence?

Shortcomings are actually valuable opportunities that enable you to explore your potentials. Without shortcomings, you may not be able to find these valuable opportunities.

4
  • You might want to reword your question - the answer is yes, but what does that actually do for you? Commented May 21, 2021 at 19:01
  • Could you please reword it for me? I want it to look more concise. Commented May 24, 2021 at 12:41
  • 1
    The first sentence is not great. You're better off with a clause: that enable you to explore your potential. Also, stay away from "one", in most cases.
    – Lambie
    Commented May 24, 2021 at 18:01
  • May I ask why not using "one" in most cases? Commented May 27, 2021 at 7:37

1 Answer 1

2

In general, one can express this two-way implication by if and only if (shortened in mathematics to iff). But in this case it presents two problems:

  1. It requires a restructuring that is less elegant than the original.
  2. It changes "may not" into an absolute "cannot".

One's potentials can be deeply explored, if and only if one discovers shortcomings that create the opportunities to do so.

I don't think you'll find a phrase that can accurately express "if A then B; if not A then perhaps not B". I think your original sentences are fine, and could just benefit from removal of the obvious redundancy:

Shortcomings are actually valuable opportunities to explore deep into one's potentials. Without shortcomings, one may not be able to find those opportunities.

1
  • Can I rephrase this sentence as Shortcomings are actually valuable opportunities to explore deep into one's potentials, without which, one may not be able to find those opportunities? Commented Oct 25, 2022 at 9:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .