1

The bane of Britain’s great and powerful is a couple of inches long, has warty skin and a bright orange underbelly—and the power to disrupt some of their most heartfelt ambitions.

'Britain's great and powerful' seems to mean 'Britain's great people and powerful people'. How can I understand the usage grammatically? Can you use an adjective without following noun?

6
  • See this answer on English Language SE: english.stackexchange.com/a/305308/383427 Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 17:08
  • You really need to give us the source.
    – Lambie
    Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 17:16
  • @Lambie - article in the Wall Street Journal of 24 August 2023, about newts, behind a paywall. Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 17:25
  • @MichaelHarvey Yes, Michael but then at least we know where it came from!
    – Lambie
    Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 17:27
  • @Lambie - yes, and also mentions Boris Johnson's 'Newtopia' plan. Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 17:32

1 Answer 1

1

It is possible to use an adjective such as "powerful" to mean "powerful ones" or "powerful people". You can talk about "the poor" or "the rich", for example to mean "poor people" or "rich people".

So "great and powerful" means "great and powerful people", and "Britain's great and powerful" means "those British people who are great and powerful".

This conversion of an adjective to a noun depends on the right context. It isn't always idiomatic. In particular it is not idiomatic to talk about "a great an powerful". The adjective as a noun refers to the collective of all people, not a single person. So you would use plural agreement. "The rich are getting fatter."

1
  • 3
    Indeed, in such constructions, you can read the as equivalent to those who are. Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 19:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .