1

From Rodney Huddleston Geoffrey K Pullum. (2017). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. ch.7.6.1 #Landmark and trajector

In formulating expressions about spatial relationships, typically one entity is taken as a reference point (or area) with respect to which another is located.

Is it a typo?

5
  • 1
    No. Which can be used of places or areas. It's often better to use "which" when talking about a place in a more abstract or general sense, e.g. "France is a country which I want to visit" vs describing the place where something happened "Provence is the area of France where he met his wife."
    – Stuart F
    Commented Apr 24 at 9:28
  • @Stuart F In both of your examples, there are antecedents. But in the question above, there is no such antecedent.
    – Mr. Wang
    Commented Apr 24 at 9:42
  • "Which" is referring to the reference point, not the location of the second place. Commented Apr 24 at 10:18
  • "which another is located with respect to." is easy to understand. I always find 'locate' with 'to' , rarely with 'with respect to'.
    – Mr. Wang
    Commented Apr 25 at 1:48
  • @StuartF That won't really help in this case! Commented Apr 25 at 8:24

1 Answer 1

2

Which and where in relative clauses:

I have simplified the Original Poster's example in (1) below:

  1. a point with respect to which [another point is related]

In the relative clause above, the word "which" is the complement of the preposition "to". "Which" is a pronoun, and like other pronouns it replaces noun phrases. In the example above,"which" refers back to the noun phrase "a point". So we understand the relative clause like this:

  1. a point [with respect to that point [another point is related]]

The word where replaces preposition phrases, not noun phrases:

  1. the bed which [the dog slept in [the bed]]
  2. the bed where [the dog slept in [the bed]] (ungrammatical)

Example (3) where "which" replaces the noun "the bed" is grammatical. Example (4) where "where" is used to replace "the bed" doesn't work.

However, we can change the sentence so that the relative word replaces the whole preposition phrase instead of the noun phrase inside it:

  1. the bed which [the dog slept [in the bed]] (ungrammatical)
  2. the bed where [the dog slept [in the bed]]

This time, when the relative word replaces the preposition phrase "in the bed", the word "which" doesn't work and "where" is grammatical*".

For this reason we can see that example (1) needs the word "which" after the preposition "to" where it takes the place of a noun phrase:"that point"

We might wonder whether we could replace the whole preposition phrase "to that point" with the word "where". That would be a good question. The answer is "no", because the word "to" here is part of the fixed phrase "with respect to". Because "with respect to" is a fixed phrase, it cannot be changed and the word "to"cannot be replaced by another word.

That's all folks!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .