a) The more I study, the less I learn.
b) More I study, less I learn.
Could we rewrite the sentence shown under the letter a) in the form shown under the letter b) without breaking any grammatical rule? If not, why not?
a) The more I study, the less I learn.
b) More I study, less I learn.
Could we rewrite the sentence shown under the letter a) in the form shown under the letter b) without breaking any grammatical rule? If not, why not?
This construction is an idiom which is not governed by any general grammatical rule, but is in effect a rule all by itself. Its structure is
The [x-ER], the [x-ER]
where the two [x-ER]s are parallel expressions in the comparative grade.
The [more], the [merrier]
[x-ER] need not be a simple adjective; it can be a more complex (or compound) phrase or full clause, with the comparative fronted:
The [higher they rise], the [harder they fall]
The [more effort I put into something I care about], the [more satisfaction I get out of it]
But the thes are essential components; they cannot ordinarily be omitted. To be sure, you may hear someone drop them in speech, under the pressure of strong emotion (real or simulated):
Crap. Harder I work, less I get done. Crap.
But that should not be done in writing, unless what you're writing is dialogue.
As described in this answer, you may rephrase it into if-then construct:
If I study more, then I learn less
This answer suggests that yes, it is governed by a rule called parallel comparative.
See also Google search for ELU; it returns 2,260 hits.